I still remember the first time I stumbled upon the PG-Incan ruins during my research trip to Peru. While mainstream archaeology had documented the major sites thoroughly, what fascinated me were the subtle patterns in the stonework that reminded me of something entirely different - the creative problem-solving I'd seen in speedrunning communities. You see, traditional archaeology often approaches these ancient sites with established methodologies, much like how most people play games by following the intended rules. But just as speedrunners find new ways to complete games faster, sometimes we need to look at ancient civilizations through a different lens.
The parallel struck me while reading about how speedrunners have flourished through their creativity in developing new challenges. They don't just play the game - they reinvent how it can be played. This approach sacrifices conventional gameplay for innovative simplicity, creating what essentially becomes a new experience altogether. Similarly, when examining PG-Incan structures, I noticed patterns that conventional archaeology might dismiss as decorative or ritualistic. But what if these were actually sophisticated systems designed with multiple functions? The conventional approach gives us a solid foundation, much like how standard speedrunning routes provide a good starting point for newcomers, but it rarely pushes beyond established boundaries.
Let me give you a concrete example from my fieldwork last spring. While studying the irrigation channels at a lesser-known PG-Incan site northwest of Cusco, I noticed something peculiar about the water flow patterns. Mainstream research suggested these channels served purely practical purposes, but the mathematical precision in their angles and the way they interacted with certain architectural features suggested something more. It reminded me of watching speedrunners exploit game mechanics in ways developers never intended. They might use a wall jump glitch to bypass entire levels, sacrificing the intended experience for efficiency. Similarly, these ancient engineers might have been using water flow not just for irrigation, but as part of a larger computational or calendrical system that we're only beginning to understand.
What's particularly fascinating is how both communities - speedrunners and alternative archaeologists - operate on similar principles. We're talking about groups that comprise approximately 15-20% of their respective fields, according to my estimates from conference attendance and community engagement. They both start with the established rules but aren't afraid to break them when they discover something interesting. The speedrunning community's creativity in developing new challenges has led to discovering game mechanics even developers forgot about. In my own work, applying this mindset has revealed potential astronomical alignments in PG-Incan structures that conventional surveys missed because they were looking for different patterns.
I'll never forget the evening I spent with local historian Miguel Quispe, watching him demonstrate how certain stone carvings could be interpreted as instructional diagrams rather than purely artistic expressions. His hands moved with the same focused energy I've seen in speedrunners explaining complex sequence breaks. "The academic world wants clear categories," he told me, "but the ancient world wasn't so neatly organized." This resonates with how speedrunning communities often develop their own terminology and methods outside mainstream gaming culture. Both groups understand that sometimes you need to step outside established frameworks to see what others have missed.
The beauty of this approach is that it doesn't invalidate conventional research - it complements it. Just as speedrunning introduces new ways to appreciate classic games, alternative perspectives on PG-Incan culture can reveal dimensions that traditional archaeology overlooks. During my 2018 excavation season, we documented over 47 architectural features that conventional surveys had categorized as "decorative" but which our team believes served practical computational purposes. The mainstream archaeological community has been skeptical, much like how game developers sometimes view speedrunning techniques as breaking their intended experience. But this tension between established methods and innovative approaches is what drives discovery in both fields.
What I've come to appreciate through years of fieldwork is that the most exciting discoveries often happen when we're willing to sacrifice comprehensive methodology for creative simplicity. The speedrunning community thrives by setting constraints that force innovation - completing games with minimal items or under specific conditions. Similarly, by limiting ourselves to examining just one aspect of PG-Incan architecture at a time, my team has identified potential acoustic properties in certain structures that could have served communication purposes across vast distances. We estimate that about 60% of the sites we've examined show evidence of this, though I'll admit my enthusiasm might make that number slightly optimistic.
The connection might seem unlikely at first - ancient civilizations and modern gaming communities - but they share this fundamental truth: innovation often comes from working within constraints while thinking outside established patterns. As I prepare for my next research trip, I'm collaborating with both archaeologists and, surprisingly, several members of the speedrunning community who've expressed interest in applying their pattern-recognition skills to archaeological data. Who would have thought that people who spend hours perfecting Super Mario 64 runs would have insights into pre-Columbian engineering? But then again, the most profound connections often appear in the most unexpected places.
The form must be submitted for students who meet the criteria below.
- Dual Enrollment students currently enrolled at Georgia College
- GC students who attend another school as a transient for either the Fall or Spring semester (the student needs to send an official transcript to the Admissions Office once their final grade is posted)
- Students who withdraw and receive a full refund for a Fall or Spring semester
- Non-Degree Seeking students (must update every semester)
- Non-Degree Seeking, Amendment 23 students (must update every semester)
- Students who wish to attend/return to GC and applied or were enrolled less than a year ago (If more than a year has passed, the student needs to submit a new application)